Reducing the uncertainty of radiata pine site index maps using an spatial ensemble of machine learning models
Forests, ISSN: 1999-4907, Vol: 12, Issue: 1, Page: 1-21
2021
- 12Citations
- 24Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Site Index has been widely used as an age normalised metric in order to account for variation in forest height at a range of spatial scales. Although previous research has used a range of modelling methods to describe the regional variation in Site Index, little research has examined gains that can be achieved through the use of regression kriging or spatial ensemble methods. In this study, an extensive set of environmental surfaces were used as covariates to predict Site Index measurements covering the environmental range of Pinus radiata D. Don plantations in Chile. Using this dataset, the objectives of this research were to (i) compare predictive precision of a range of geostatistical, parametric, and non-parametric models, (ii) determine whether significant gains in precision can be attained through use of regression kriging, (iii) evaluate the precision of a spatial ensemble model that utilises predictions from the five most precise models, through using the model prediction with lowest error for a given pixel, and (iv) produce a map of Site Index across the study area. The five most precise models were all geostatistical and they included ordinary kriging and four regression kriging models that were based on partial least squares or random forests. A spatial ensemble model that was constructed from these five models was the most precise of those developed (RMSE = 1.851 m, RMSE% = 6.38%) and it had relatively little bias. Climatic and edaphic variables were the strongest determinants of Site Index and, in particular, variables that are related to soil water balance were well represented within the most precise predictive models. These results highlight the utility of predicting Site Index using a range of approaches, as these can be used to construct a spatial ensemble that may be more precise than predictions from the constituent models.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know