Which out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest patients without st‐segment elevation benefit from early coronary angiography? Results from the korean hypothermia network prospective registry
Journal of Clinical Medicine, ISSN: 2077-0383, Vol: 10, Issue: 3, Page: 1-12
2021
- 11Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef9
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
The effect of early coronary angiography (CAG) in out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients without ST‐elevation (STE) is still controversial. It is not known which subgroups of patients without STE are the most likely to benefit. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between emergency CAG and neurologic outcomes and identify subgroups with improved outcomes when emergency CAG was performed. This prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was based on data from the Korean Hypothermia Network prospective registry (KORHN‐PRO) 1.0. Adult OHCA patients who were treated with targeted temperature management (TTM) without any obvious extracardiac cause were included. Patients were dichotomized into early CAG (≤24 h) and no early CAG (>24 h or not performed) groups. High‐risk patients were defined as having the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score >140, time from collapse to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) >30 min, lactate level >7.0 mmol/L, arterial pH <7.2, cardiac enzyme elevation and ST deviation. The primary outcome was good neurologic outcome at 6 months after OHCA. Of the 1373 patients from the KORHN‐PRO 1.0 database, 678 patients met the inclusion criteria. The early CAG group showed better neurologic outcomes at 6 months after cardiac arrest (CA) (adjusted odds ratio: 2.21 (1.27–3.87), p = 0.005). This was maintained even after propensity score matching (adjusted odds ratio: 2.23 (1.39–3.58), p <0.001). In the subgroup analysis, high‐risk patients showed a greater benefit from early CAG. In contrast, no significant association was found in low‐risk patients. Early CAG was associated with good neurologic outcome at 6 months after CA and should be considered in high‐risk patients.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know