Detection of renal injury following primary coronary intervention among st-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: Doubling the incidence using neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a renal biomarker
Journal of Clinical Medicine, ISSN: 2077-0383, Vol: 10, Issue: 10
2021
- 10Citations
- 8Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef8
- Captures8
- Readers8
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Most Recent Blog
JCM, Vol. 10, Pages 2120: Detection of Renal Injury Following Primary Coronary Intervention among ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Doubling the Incidence Using Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin as a Renal Biomarker
JCM, Vol. 10, Pages 2120: Detection of Renal Injury Following Primary Coronary Intervention among ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients: Doubling the Incidence Using Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated
Article Description
Background: A subgroup of patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) do not fulfil the functional criteria for AKI diagnosis but show elevated levels of new biomarkers reflecting tubular injury, suggesting that these patients suffer “subclinical AKI”. We investigated the incidence and possible implications of “subclinical AKI”, compared to no and clinical AKI among ST elevation myocardial infarction patients (STEMI) treated with primary coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: We included 223 patients with STEMI treated with PCI. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) was used as a marker of renal tubular damage in the absence of functional AKI, with NGAL levels ≥100 ng/mL suggesting subclinical AKI. Patients were assessed for the occurrence of in-hospital adverse outcomes. Results: Of the study patients, 45 (25%) had subclinical AKI. These patients were more likely to have left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% (33% vs. 23%. p = 0.01), in-hospital adverse outcomes (73% vs. 48%; p = 0.005), and a combination of the two. The multivariate regression model demonstrated that subclinical AKI was independently associated with in-hospital adverse outcomes (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.30–10.62, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Subclinical AKI is common among STEMI patients and is independently associated with adverse outcomes, even in the absence of functional AKI.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know