Elastic critical moment for the lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) analysis of structural glass beams with discrete mechanical lateral restraints
Materials, ISSN: 1996-1944, Vol: 13, Issue: 11
2020
- 16Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef14
- Captures14
- Readers14
- 14
Article Description
Structural glass beams and fins are largely used in buildings, in the form of primary load-bearing members and bracing systems for roof or facade panels. Several loading and boundary conditions can be efficiently solved by means of bonded composites that involve the use of laminated glass sections. Additionally, the so-obtained glass members are often characterized by high slenderness. To this aim, several literature studies were dedicated to the lateral-torsional buckling (LTB) behavior of laterally unrestrained (LU) glass elements, with the support of full-scale experiments, analytical models, or finite element (FE) numerical investigations. Standardized design recommendations for LU glass members in LTB are available for designers. However, several design issues still require "ad hoc" (and often expensive) calculation studies. In most of the cases, for example, the mechanical interaction between the structural components to verify involves various typologies of joints, including continuous sealant connections, mechanical point fixings, or hybrid solutions. As a result, an accurate estimation of the theoretical LTB critical moment for such a kind of laterally restrained (LR) element represents a first key issue toward the definition and calibration of generalized design recommendations. Careful consideration should be spent for the description of the intrinsic features of materials in use, as well as for a combination of geometrical and mechanical aspects (i.e., geometry, number, position of restraints, etc.). In this paper, the attention is focused on the calculation of the elastic critical buckling moment of LR glass beams in LTB. Existing analytical approaches of the literature (mostly developed for steel constructional members) are briefly recalled. An additional advantage for extended parametric calculations is then taken from finite element (FE) numerical analyses, which are performed via the LTBeam or the ABAQUS software codes. The actual role and the effect of discrete mechanical restraints are, thus, explored for selected configurations of practical interest. Finally, the reliability of simplified calculation approaches is assessed.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know