Minimization of Surface Roughness and Temperature during Turning of Aluminum 6061 Using Response Surface Methodology and Desirability Function Analysis
Materials, ISSN: 1996-1944, Vol: 15, Issue: 21
2022
- 13Citations
- 25Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Materials, Vol. 15, Pages 7638: Minimization of Surface Roughness and Temperature during Turning of Aluminum 6061 Using Response Surface Methodology and Desirability Function Analysis
Materials, Vol. 15, Pages 7638: Minimization of Surface Roughness and Temperature during Turning of Aluminum 6061 Using Response Surface Methodology and Desirability Function Analysis Materials
Article Description
Aluminum alloy is the second most abundant metal on Earth, known for its wide range of utilization in commercial goods due to its heat capacity and tensile strength. This study examines the effect of nose radius on the turning process. Further, it explores the implications of cutting parameters such as the cutting speed, the rate of feed, the cutting depth, and the nose radius of the tool. The trials were carried out with an Al 6061 workpiece and an AlO-coated carbide tool as the cutter, utilizing the response surface methodology. A mathematical model was developed to investigate the performance characteristics of the turning operation using the analysis of variance method. The multi-response desirability function analysis combines individual desirability values to create a composite desirability value. The ideal parameter levels were determined using the composite desirability value, and the significant influence of parameters was assessed. The obtained optimum surface roughness and temperature parameters are at a cutting speed of 116.37 m/min, a rate of feed of 0.408 mm/rev, a cutting depth of 0.538 mm, and a tool nose radius of 0.20 mm. The related ideal surface roughness and temperature values are 0.374 µm and 27.439 °C. The optimal overall desirability value is 0.829, close to the target response.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know