Absolute and Functional Iron Deficiency in Colon Cancer: A Cohort Study
Medicina (Lithuania), ISSN: 1648-9144, Vol: 58, Issue: 9
2022
- 4Citations
- 13Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef4
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Article Description
Background and Objectives: Iron is an essential micronutrient for many biological functions and has been found to be intimately linked to cancer biology. Although the effects of increased dietary iron consumption in the development of CRC have been previously investigated in several cohort studies, the available evidence on the involvement of iron deficiency in this process is relatively scarce. Previously published papers did not analyze specific outcomes, such as the presence of biologically aggressive histopathological characteristics, that are associated with the subtypes of iron deficiency. The purpose of this study was to investigate the connection between the development of colorectal cancer and the presence of functional iron deficiency (FID), which is defined as insufficient biological availability of iron in the presence of adequate storage reserves, or absolute iron deficiency (AID), which is defined as severely depleted iron storage levels. Materials and Methods: Our paper represents a single center registry-based cohort study. Iron levels were routinely evaluated upon diagnosis of CRC and the collected data were coupled with patient- and tumor-specific data (2018–2022). Spearman’s correlation coefficient and the chi-squared test were used to analyze the association. Results: Out of 129 patients, 75 (58.13%) were anemic. AID was identified in 26.35% of cases and FID was encountered in 51.16% of cases. A statistically significant association between FID and lymphatic invasion was encountered. An analysis of the correlation demonstrated a significant association between anemia and right-sided tumor location. Conclusions: Functional iron deficiency seems to be independently associated with lymphatic invasion. Although a statistically significant correlation with the T or N stage was not demonstrated, the analysis suggested a potential positive relationship between the presence of FID and more aggressive tumor characteristics.
Bibliographic Details
MDPI AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know