Isolation procedure for cp e. Coli from caeca samples under review towards an increased sensitivity
Microorganisms, ISSN: 2076-2607, Vol: 9, Issue: 5
2021
- 2Citations
- 10Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes1
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures10
- Readers10
- 10
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent Blog
Microorganisms, Vol. 9, Pages 1105: Isolation Procedure for CP E. coli from Caeca Samples under Review towards an Increased Sensitivity
Microorganisms, Vol. 9, Pages 1105: Isolation Procedure for CP E. coli from Caeca Samples under Review towards an Increased Sensitivity Microorganisms doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051105 Authors: Natalie
Most Recent News
Wissenschaftliche Publikationen in Fachzeitschriften 2021
Wissenschaftliche Publikationen in Fachzeitschriften 2021 A Adler, M., S. Al Dahouk, A. Flieger, S. Halbedel, A. Holzer, S. Kleta, R. Lachmann, S. Lüth, K. Nöckler,
Article Description
Due to the increasing reports of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) from livestock in recent years, the European Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistances (EURLAR) provided a protocol for their recovery from caecum and meat samples. This procedure exhibited limitations for the detection of CPE with low carbapenem MIC values. Therefore, it was modified by a second, selective enrichment in lysogeny broth with cefotaxime (CTX 1 mg/L) and with meropenem (MEM 0.125 mg/L) at 37 °C under microaerophilic conditions. By Real-time PCR, these enrichments are pre-screened for the most common carbapenemase genes. Another adaptation was the use of in-house prepared MacConkey agar with MEM and MEM+CTX instead of commercial selective agar. According to the EURL-method, we achieved 100% sensitivity and specificity using the in-house media instead of commercial agar, which decreased the sensitivity to ~75%. Comparing the method with and without the second enrichment, no substantial influence on sensitivity and specificity was detected. Nevertheless, this enrichment has simplified the CPEisolation regarding the accompanying microbiota and the separation of putative colonies. In conclusion, the sensitivity of the method can be increased with slight modifications.
Bibliographic Details
MDPI AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know