Chronic effects of a wild green oat extract supplementation on cognitive performance in older adults: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial
Nutrients, ISSN: 2072-6643, Vol: 4, Issue: 5, Page: 331-342
2012
- 9Citations
- 107Captures
- 9Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef7
- Captures107
- Readers107
- 107
- Mentions9
- News Mentions7
- 7
- Blog Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent Blog
Minerals And Vitamin Suggestions For Neuropathy You May Not Have Heard Of
Today's post from nervepaintreatment.org (see link below) is yet another list! What is it with people and lists these days! Top tens. twenties, fifties hundreds...it
Most Recent News
Virectin Review – Will It Work For You?
Virectin is an ED supplement that increases blood flow in as little as seven days. Each capsule contains a maximum-strength formula designed to help you
Article Description
Background and aim: Preliminary evaluation of a wild green oat extract (WGOE) (Neuravena® ELFA®955, Frutarom, Switzerland) revealed an acute cognitive benefit of supplementation. This study investigated whether regular daily WGOE supplementation would result in sustained cognitive improvements. Method: A 12-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over trial of WGOE supplementation (1500 mg/day) versus placebo was undertaken in 37 healthy adults aged 67 ± 0.8 years (mean ± SEM). Cognitive assessments included the Stroop colour-word test, letter cancellation, the rule-shift task, a computerised multi-tasking test battery and the trail-making task. All assessments were conducted in Week 12 and repeated in Week 24 whilst subjects were fasted and at least 18 h after taking the last dose of supplement. Result: Chronic WGOE supplementation did not affect any measures of cognition. Conclusion: It appears that the cognitive benefit of acute WGOE supplementation does not persist with chronic treatment in older adults with normal cognition. It remains to be seen whether sustained effects of WGOE supplementation may be more evident in those with mild cognitive impairment. © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84950170885&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu4050331; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22690320; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/4/5/331; https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu4050331; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/4/5/331/pdf; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/4/5/331/htm; http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/4/5/331; http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/4/5/331/; https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/4/5/331/pdf?version=1336035366
MDPI AG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know