PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Comparing low-temperature hydrothermal pretreatments through convective heating versus microwave heating for napier grass digestion

Processes, ISSN: 2227-9717, Vol: 8, Issue: 10, Page: 1-16
2020
  • 12
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 47
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    12
    • Citation Indexes
      12
  • Captures
    47
  • Mentions
    1
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1

Most Recent Blog

Processes, Vol. 8, Pages 1221: Comparing Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Pretreatments through Convective Heating versus Microwave Heating for Napier Grass Digestion

Processes, Vol. 8, Pages 1221: Comparing Low-Temperature Hydrothermal Pretreatments through Convective Heating versus Microwave Heating for Napier Grass Digestion Processes doi: 10.3390/pr8101221 Authors: Saritpongteeraka Kaewsung

Article Description

This study investigates the effects of convective hydrothermal pretreatment (CHTP) compared to microwave pretreatment (MWP) on the anaerobic digestion of hybrid Napier grass for biomethane production. For rapid estimation of methane yield (Y), enzymatic hydrolyzability (EH), whose test lasts only 2 days was used as a surrogate parameter instead of the biochemical methane potential (BMP) assay that normally takes 45–60 days. The relationship between EH and BMP was successfully modeled with satisfactory accuracy (R = 0.9810). From CHTP results, quadratic regression characterised by p < 0.0001 and R = 0.8364 shows that Y increase was clearly sensitive to detention time at all CHTP temperatures. The maximal Y achieved of 301.5 ± 3.0 mL CH /gVS was 53.2% higher than the control. Then, MWP was employed at various power levels and microwave exposure times. Changes in lignocellulosic structure by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and energy balance demonstrate that MWP caused more damage to plant cells, which proved more effective than CHTP. In the best conditions, approximately 50% of energy was needed for MWP to achieve the equivalent improvement in Y. However, CHTP is a more suitable option since waste heat, i.e., from a biogas CHP (combined heat and power) unit, could be used, as opposed to the electricity required for MWP.

Bibliographic Details

Kanyarat Saritpongteeraka; Jutawan Kaewsung; Sumate Chaiprapat; Boonya Charnnok

MDPI AG

Chemical Engineering

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know