Robust Semi-Supervised Point Cloud Registration via Latent GMM-Based Correspondence
Remote Sensing, ISSN: 2072-4292, Vol: 15, Issue: 18
2023
- 5Citations
- 1Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, Pages 4493: Robust Semi-Supervised Point Cloud Registration via Latent GMM-Based Correspondence
Remote Sensing, Vol. 15, Pages 4493: Robust Semi-Supervised Point Cloud Registration via Latent GMM-Based Correspondence Remote Sensing doi: 10.3390/rs15184493 Authors: Zhengyan Zhang Erli Lyu Zhe
Most Recent News
Harbin Institute of Technology Researchers Have Provided New Data on Remote Sensing (Robust Semi-Supervised Point Cloud Registration via Latent GMM-Based Correspondence)
2023 OCT 09 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Tech Daily News -- Research findings on remote sensing are discussed in a
Article Description
Due to the fact that point clouds are always corrupted by significant noise and large transformations, aligning two point clouds by deep neural networks is still challenging. This paper presents a semi-supervised point cloud registration (PCR) method for accurately estimating point correspondences and handling large transformations using limited prior datasets. Firstly, a modified autoencoder is introduced as the feature extraction module to extract the distinctive and robust features for the downstream registration task. Unlike optimization-based pairwise PCR strategies, the proposed method treats two point clouds as two implementations of a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), which we call latent GMM. Based on the above assumption, two point clouds can be regarded as two probability distributions. Hence, the PCR of two point clouds can be approached by minimizing the KL divergence between these two probability distributions. Then, the correspondence between the point clouds and the latent GMM components is estimated using the augmented regression network. Finally, the parameters of GMM can be updated by the correspondence and the transformation matrix can be computed by employing the weighted singular value decomposition (SVD) method. Extensive experiments conducted on both synthetic and real-world data validate the superior performance of the proposed method compared to state-of-the-art registration methods. These experiments also highlight the method’s superiority in terms of accuracy, robustness, and generalization.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know