Prediction of tool forces in manual grinding using consumer-grade sensors and machine learning
Sensors, ISSN: 1424-8220, Vol: 21, Issue: 21
2021
- 8Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef6
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
Article Description
Tool forces are a decisive parameter for manual grinding with hand-held power tools, which can be used to determine the productivity, quality of the work result, vibration exposition, and tool lifetime. One approach to tool force determination is the prediction of tool forces via measured operating parameters of a hand-held power tool. The problem is that the accuracy of tool force prediction with consumer-grade sensors remains unclear in manual grinding. Therefore, the accuracy of tool force prediction using Gaussian process regression is examined in a study for two hand-held angle grinders in four different applications in three directions using measurement data from an inertial measurement unit, a current sensor, and a voltage sensor. The prediction of the grinding normal force (rMAE = 11.44% and r = 0.84) and the grinding tangential force (rMAE = 18.21% and r = 0.82) for three tested applications, as well as the radial force for the application cutting with a cut-off wheel (rMAE = 19.67% and r = 0.80) is shown to be feasible. The prediction of the guiding force (rMAE = 87.02% and r = 0.37) for three tested applications is only possible to a limited extent. This study supports data acquisition and evaluation of hand-held power tools using consumer-grade sensors, such as an inertial measurement unit, in real-world applications, resulting in new potentials for product use and product development.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know