PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Using disaster outcomes to validate components of social vulnerability to floods: Flood deaths and property damage across the USA

Sustainability (Switzerland), ISSN: 2071-1050, Vol: 12, Issue: 15, Page: 1-28
2020
  • 51
    Citations
  • 259
    Usage
  • 157
    Captures
  • 2
    Mentions
  • 49
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    51
    • Citation Indexes
      51
  • Usage
    259
  • Captures
    157
  • Mentions
    2
    • News Mentions
      2
      • News
        2
  • Social Media
    49
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      49
      • Facebook
        49

Most Recent News

Five key needs for addressing flood injustice

What do Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Tula, Mexico (a city outside Mexico City), have in common?  Both have histories of communities experiencing unequal flood exposure,

Article Description

Social vulnerability indicators seek to identify populations susceptible to hazards based on aggregated sociodemographic data. Vulnerability indices are rarely validated with disaster outcome data at broad spatial scales, making it difficult to develop effective national scale strategies to mitigate loss for vulnerable populations. This paper validates social vulnerability indicators using two flood outcomes: death and damage. Regression models identify sociodemographic factors associated with variation in outcomes from 11,629 non-coastal flood events in the USA (2008-2012), controlling for flood intensity using stream gauge data. We compare models with (i) socioeconomic variables, (ii) the composite social vulnerability index (SoVI), and (iii) flood intensity variables only. The SoVI explains a larger portion of the variance in death (AIC = 2829) and damage (R = 0.125) than flood intensity alone (death-AIC = 2894; damage-R = 0.089), and models with individual sociodemographic factors perform best (death-AIC = 2696; damage-R = 0.229). Socioeconomic variables correlated with death (rural counties with a high proportion of elderly and young) differ from those related to property damage (rural counties with high percentage of Black, Hispanic and Native American populations below the poverty line). Results confirm that social vulnerability influences death and damage from floods in the USA. Model results indicate that social vulnerability models related to specific hazards and outcomes perform better than generic social vulnerability indices (e.g., SoVI) in predicting non-coastal flood death and damage. Hazard- and outcome-specific indices could be used to better direct efforts to ameliorate flood death and damage towards the people and places that need it most. Future validation studies should examine other flood outcomes, such as evacuation, migration and health, across scales.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know