Endoscopic full-thickness resection: Current status
World Journal of Gastroenterology, ISSN: 2219-2840, Vol: 21, Issue: 31, Page: 9273-9285
2015
- 71Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations71
- Citation Indexes70
- 70
- CrossRef29
- Patent Family Citations1
- 1
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Article Description
Conventional endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection or endoscopic submucosal dissection are powerful tools for treatment of gastrointestinal neoplasms. However, those techniques are restricted to superficial layers of the gastrointestinal wall. Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an evolving technique, which is just about to enter clinical routine. It is not only a powerful tool for diagnostic tissue acquisition but also has the potential to spare surgical therapy in selected patients. This review will give an overview about current EFTR techniques and devices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84940063696&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9273; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309354; http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i31/9273.htm; https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i31.9273; https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i31/9273.htm
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know