Monetary reward increases attentional effort in the flanker task
Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, ISSN: 1069-9384, Vol: 17, Issue: 6, Page: 821-826
2010
- 71Citations
- 161Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations71
- Citation Indexes71
- 71
- CrossRef33
- Captures161
- Readers161
- 161
Article Description
An important question is whether monetary reward can increase attentional effort in order to improve performance. Up to now, evidence for a positive answer is weak. Therefore, in the present study, the flanker task was used to examine this question further. Participants had to respond sooner than a certain deadline in a flanker task. One group of participants received a performance-contingent monetary reward, whereas the other group earned a fixed amount of money. As a result, monetary reward significantly improved performance in comparison with the control group. The analysis of speed-accuracy trade-off functions revealed that monetary reward increased attentional effort, leading to an enhanced quality of stimulus coding. Little evidence was found that reward also improved selective spatial attention. © 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78651260228&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/pbr.17.6.821; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21169575; http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/PBR.17.6.821; http://www.springerlink.com/index/pdf/10.3758/PBR.17.6.821; http://link.springer.com/10.3758/PBR.17.6.821; https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FPBR.17.6.821; https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/pbr.17.6.821; https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/PBR.17.6.821
Springer Nature
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know