FUNCTIONALISATION OF THE BOUNDARY LAYER BY DEFORMATION-INDUCED MARTENSITE ON BEARING RINGS BY MEANS OF BULK METAL FORMING PROCESSES
31st International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, METAL 2022, Page: 250-255
2022
- 2Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
Conference Paper Description
During cold forming of metastable austenitic steels, a strength-increasing phase transformation induced by externally superimposed stresses occurs in addition to strain hardening. The effect of deformation-induced martensite formation has so far not been utilized industrially in the area of bulk forming, but could be suitable for the production of highly-loaded components in oxidative atmospheres. The aim of this study is the analysis of local phase transformations in metastable austenitic steels in the boundary layer of bulk formed components. For this purpose, the relationship between the process conditions occurring during bulk metal forming and the resulting martensitic phase fraction was determined. Cylinder compression tests are carried out in which the influence of various process parameters can be investigated. These include forming temperature, true plastic strain and forming speed. In a quantitative measurement by means of a magnetic induction process, local martensite formation is determined and hardness measurements are carried out. The recorded flow stress curves are implemented in a numerical simulation. Furthermore, the influence of different tool surface topographies on the contact conditions of the workpiece-tool system is characterized by means of ring compression tests. With the numerical simulations and experimentally obtained results, a surface hardening process for bearing rings is designed. The relationship between local true plastic strain and deformation-induced martensite development is explained by material flow simulations, taking into account the process route for manufacturing the bearing ring and the varying friction factors.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144144123&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.37904/metal.2022.4394; https://www.confer.cz/metal/2022/4394-functionalization-of-the-boundary-layer-by-deformation-induced-martensite-on-bearing-rings-by-means-of-bulk-metal-forming-processes; https://dx.doi.org/10.37904/metal.2022.4394
TANGER Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know