Method of Fracture Characterization and Productivity Prediction of 19⁃6 Buried⁃Hill Fractured Reservoirs, Bohai Bay Basin
Diqiu Kexue - Zhongguo Dizhi Daxue Xuebao/Earth Science - Journal of China University of Geosciences, ISSN: 1000-2383, Vol: 48, Issue: 2, Page: 475-487
2023
- 8Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
In Bozhong 19 ‐ 6 gas field, due to the different types of reservoir spaces, strong heterogeneity, and unclear of main controlling factor of productivity of buried‐hill fractured reservoirs, which makes it difficult to predict the productivity. In order to solve this problem, the characteristics of buried‐hill fractured reservoirs are analyzed based on core, logging, geological and other data. Additionally, based on the CT scan experiment, the fractures can be quantitatively characterized and a series of calculation methods of fracture parameters including fracture permeability are formed. As a result, the productivity prediction model for buried-hill fractured reservoirs is established and the problem of productivity prediction of buried‐hill fractured reservoirs is solved. The research results show that the fracture permeability of buried‐hill fractured reservoirs is mainly controlled by the length, width and connectivity of the fractures, and has no obvious relationship with the porosity. Then, the fracture permeability can be calculated from the difference between the total permeability obtained by Stoneley wave inversion and the matrix permeability. The relative errors of matrix permeability and total permeability calculations are respectively 28.50% and 15.56%. Based on the fracture permeability, fracture longitudinal connectivity and effective thickness of buried ‐ hill fractured reservoirs, the productivity prediction model for buried ‐ hill fractured reservoirs can be established in Bozhong 19 ‐ 6 gas field. The accuracy of fracture permeability calculation result determines the reliability of productivity prediction result of buried‐hill fractured reservoirs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85152104433&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2022.299; http://www.earth-science.net/article/doi/10.3799/dqkx.2022.299; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7420053&internal_id=7420053&from=elsevier; https://dx.doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2022.299
Editorial Office of Earth Science
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know