G2 and Sgr A∗: A Cosmic Fizzle at the Galactic Center
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 843, Issue: 1
2017
- 1Citations
- 13Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
From AAS NOVA: "The Story of a Boring Encounter with a Black Hole"
American Astronomical Society 24 July 2017 Susanna Kohler Many simulations from before G2’s encounter with Sgr A* (like the one shown here, from a group
Article Description
We carry out a series of simulations of G2-type clouds interacting with the black hole at the galactic center, to determine why no large changes in the luminosity of Sgr A∗ were seen, and to determine the nature of G2. We measure the accretion rate from the gas cloud onto Sgr A∗ for a range of simulation parameters, such as cloud structure, background structure, background density, grid resolution, and accretion radius. For a broad range of parameters, the amount of cloud material accreted is small relative to the amount of background material accreted. The total accretion rate is not significantly effected for at least 30 yr after periapsis. We find that reproducing observations of G2 likely requires two components for the object: an extended, cold gas cloud responsible for the Br-γ emission, and a compact core or dusty stellar object dominating the bolometric luminosity. In simulations, the bolometric and X-ray luminosity have a peak lasting from about one year before to one year after periapsis, a feature not detected in observations. Our simulated Br-γ emission is largely consistent with observations leading up to periapsis, with a slight increase in luminosity and a large increase in the FWHM of the line velocity. All emission from a gaseous component of G2 should fade rapidly after periapsis and be undetectable after one year, due to shock heating and expansion of the cloud. Any remaining emission should be from the compact component of G2.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021778917&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa773d; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aa773d; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa773d; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=91a7c8bd-5657-4741-88c1-f536b3b8dbf4&ssb=11967256623&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faa773d&ssi=f08de041-cnvj-43fe-9c21-d67ca202b0f5&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=753833714593673747788851771460957497&ssn=dc49575bb681b72d40a508abf9845805da170900c3c4-8990-4f21-ac5a35&sso=933baf8c-bc564dd29dea69e894b51cd81a129a9fa47fed841cc39123&ssp=50503098891726536923172704618148453&ssq=73722228878926281930629239017683819924491&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTU5NTUwMzc1LTg0ZmI4NzlmMDY1ZDgwNjM3Nzg3MTQiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlOC0xNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTU5NTUwMzc1LTAwZDFhMzRlZWY2ODcxODY3Nzg2MzAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know