Constraints to Dark Energy Using PADE Parameterizations
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 843, Issue: 1
2017
- 63Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We put constraints on dark energy (DE) properties using PADE parameterization, and compare it to the same constraints using Chevalier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) and ACDM, at both the background and the perturbation levels. The DE equation of the state parameter of the models is derived following the mathematical treatment of PADE expansion. Unlike CPL parameterization, PADE approximation provides different forms of the equation of state parameter that avoid the divergence in the far future. Initially we perform a likelihood analysis in order to put constraints on the model parameters using solely background expansion data, and we find that all parameterizations are consistent with each other. Then, combining the expansion and the growth rate data, we test the viability of PADE parameterizations and compare them with CPL and ACDM models, respectively. Specifically, we find that the growth rate of the current PADE parameterizations is lower than ACDM model at low redshifts, while the differences among the models are negligible at high redshifts. In this context, we provide for the first time a growth index of linear matter perturbations in PADE cosmologies. Considering that DE is homogeneous, we recover the well-known asymptotic value of the growth index (namely γ = 3(W-1)/6W-5), while in the case of clustered DE, we obtain γ ≃ 3W (3W-5)/ (6W-5) (3W-1) . Finally, we generalize the growth index analysis in the case where γ is allowed to vary with redshift, and we find that the form of g (z) in PADE parameterization extends that of the CPL and ACDMcosmologies, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85021966884&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7898; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7898; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa7898; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=84d31037-b198-4847-86d4-99c3e5e58df3&ssb=46698239914&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faa7898&ssi=33deb0cd-8427-466e-a237-53ca812c8d95&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=4105402139222937786713484265625454&ssn=dd4191833359eff7a6650d9177233af48ac2a0463a4f-009b-47ce-9ad85b&sso=1e5ae1c8-61d03bb24b4f80e393dd18a282da4bf5225177860533400c&ssp=41200431541721807066172209273698857&ssq=78211920393466592592444350955184757268633&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAyMjYxY2YxNy1kOGNiLTRjMmItYWQ3Zi1mYmMwOTU3MTYzYmYxNzIxODQ0MzUwOTAyMTU5NTgzODA2LWZlOTZjZTMxY2RlZjc4NzI4NjY4IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIiwidXpteCI6IjdmOTAwMDczOGI0NTM2LWY5MTItNDE5MC1hNzhhLTg1NDBmNDZmNTQxYjMtMTcyMTg0NDM1MDkwMjE1OTU4MzgwNi0wYTVmYTU0YmYxY2Y4Y2ZiODY2OCJ9
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know