Hyperaccreting black hole as gamma-ray burst central engine. II. Temporal evolution of the central engine parameters during the prompt and afterglow phases
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 849, Issue: 1, Page: 1-12
2017
- 47Citations
- 103Usage
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations47
- Citation Indexes47
- CrossRef47
- 38
- Usage103
- Downloads101
- Abstract Views2
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
A hyperaccreting stellar-mass black hole (BH) has been proposed as the candidate central engine of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). The rich observations of GRBs by Fermi and Swift make it possible to constrain the central engine model by comparing the model predictions against data. This paper is dedicated to studying the temporal evolution of the central engine parameters for both the prompt emission and afterglow phases. We consider two jet-launching mechanisms, i.e., nn-annihilations and the Blandford-Znajek (BZ) process, and obtain analytical solutions to these two models. We then investigate the BH central engine parameters, such as the jet power, the dimensionless entropy ?, and the central engine parameter μ0 = ? (1 + s0) (where s0 is the initial magnetization of the engine) at the base of the jet. The BH may be spun up by accretion or spun down by the BZ process, leaving imprints in the GRB light curves. Usually, a BZ jet is more powerful and is likely responsible for the late-time central engine activities. However, an initially non-spinning BH central engine may first launch a thermal "fireball" via neutrino annihilations, and then launch a Poynting-flux-dominated jet via the BZ process. Multiple flares, giant bumps, and plateaus in GRB afterglows can be produced as the result of late-time accretion onto the BH.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85055807688&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9074; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9074; https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/physastr_fac_articles/331; https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1330&context=physastr_fac_articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa9074; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=b47b3194-5118-4e58-9b1c-c548a6f0a73e&ssb=82657297133&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faa9074&ssi=f45df43d-cnvj-4d1b-a4f2-1c7848a0de85&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=05796349520245894474768432153294281&ssn=de2c4da69beac9fcbe02b974b99e540b8b1a765553ad-d587-4971-863679&sso=fce2fa66-0a667121c17ae0ba965b66b7b2423ac24ce4ca9df6009ddc&ssp=75572037581734345266173478629500095&ssq=22881720570479209596970207954215696983169&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBhYWEwODA3OS0yYjZmLTQzMWUtYWIwYi1iMzU3NDJlZTczNmYxNzM0MzcwMjA3OTY2MzM1NDk3MDA5LWRkM2U1NDQ5YTA2YWZkMjE0NzQ3MCIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDA1OWJhYzM2Zi1jMjQyLTQyZTAtYjhjYi01MzM4ZDRhYmI4YjI1LTE3MzQzNzAyMDc5NjYzMzU0OTcwMDktMTAyYjYzNjNmZjQ4NjI5NDQ3NDY0In0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know