The Araucaria Project: High-precision Cepheid Astrophysics from the Analysis of Variables in Double-lined Eclipsing Binaries
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 862, Issue: 1
2018
- 36Citations
- 10Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Based on new observations and improved modeling techniques, we have reanalyzed seven Cepheids in the Large Magellanic Cloud. Improved physical parameters have been determined for the exotic system OGLE LMC-CEP-1718 composed of two first-overtone Cepheids and a completely new model was obtained for the OGLE LMC-CEP-1812 classical Cepheid. This is now the shortest period Cepheid for which the projection factor is measured. The typical accuracy of our dynamical masses and radii determinations is 1%. The radii of the six classical Cepheids follow period-radius relations in the literature. Our very accurate physical parameter measurements allow us to calculate a purely empirical, tight period-mass-radius relation that agrees well with theoretical relations derived from non-canonical models. This empirical relation is a powerful tool to calculate accurate masses for single Cepheids for which precise radii can be obtained from Baade-Wesselink-type analyses. The mass of the type-II Cepheid κ Pav, 0.56 ± 0.08 M , determined using this relation is in a very good agreement with theoretical predictions. We find large differences between the p-factor values derived for the Cepheids in our sample. Evidence is presented that a simple period-p-factor relation shows an intrinsic dispersion, hinting at the relevance of other parameters, such as the masses, radii, and radial velocity variation amplitudes. We also find evidence that the systematic blueshift exhibited by Cepheids is primarily correlated with their gravity. The companion star of the Cepheid in the OGLE LMC-CEP-4506 system has a very similar temperature and luminosity, and is clearly located inside the Cepheid instability strip, yet it is not pulsating.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85050758753&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aacb32; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aacb32; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aacb32; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=6346c18a-bb26-4c22-86da-a7048810e336&ssb=98602216025&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faacb32&ssi=155de8c6-cnvj-411d-b660-bd67d47c591c&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=94421663784515992740382958616318512&ssn=6cc4c761c77ae5b29bca4cb648681debfdd3765553ad-d587-4971-8f986a&sso=ae1b6a66-0a667121c17a42663c69beb4abab9e58229f49d335d9275c&ssp=27373383601734304213173496653355554&ssq=95756920489312937344070207429871430145904&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNTliYWMzNmYtYzI0Mi00MmUwLWI4Y2ItNTMzOGQ0YWJiOGIyNy0xNzM0MzcwMjA3OTY2NTM0Njg1ODA5LWEzODA5ODEyYjNmYjAwNjY3NDAyNiIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMGFhYTA4MDc5LTJiNmYtNDMxZS1hYjBiLWIzNTc0MmVlNzM2ZjE3MzQzNzAyMDc5NjY1MzQ2ODU4MDktNzJjNGFmY2M2MWE1MzE0Mjc0MDMyIn0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know