Planck 2015 Constraints on the Non-flat XCDM Inflation Model
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 869, Issue: 1
2018
- 49Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We examine the Planck 2015 cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy data by using a physically consistent energy density inhomogeneity power spectrum generated by quantum-mechanical fluctuations during an early epoch of inflation in the non-flat XCDM model. Here dark energy is parameterized using a fluid with a negative equation of state parameter but with the speed of fluid acoustic inhomogeneities set to the speed of light. We find that the Planck 2015 data in conjunction with baryon acoustic oscillation distance measurements are reasonably well fit by a closed-XCDM model in which spatial curvature contributes a percent of the current cosmological energy density budget. In this model, the measured non-relativistic matter density parameter and Hubble constant are in good agreement with values determined using most other data. Depending on cosmological parameter values, the closed-XCDM model has reduced power, relative to the tilted, spatially flat ΛCDM case, and can partially alleviate the low multipole CMB temperature anisotropy deficit and can help partially reconcile the CMB anisotropy and weak lensing σ constraints, at the expense of somewhat worsening the fit to higher multipole CMB temperature anisotropy data. However, the closed-XCDM inflation model does not seem to improve the agreement much, if at all, compared to the closed ΛCDM inflation case, even though it has one additional free parameter.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85058514313&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaec6f; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aaec6f; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaec6f; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=5ff1abdd-7a2c-4787-935a-1fec82f108ed&ssb=73301221245&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faaec6f&ssi=f1bd932a-cnvj-4793-a7fd-d9257783daaa&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=2356939655666464039644964095822813&ssn=4cf8e95e5b9f5ce506690ff7ef5c98ab63a8a9a60fcd-2cb2-4007-b40e4d&sso=b517cdc1-99effaea85e195e2b6cfb56b52534260694c82a2db4da32d&ssp=71192744831736976396173692047135882&ssq=35223958203291377308109927390688522126581&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBiN2M0MmExZC00ZTg0LTRjOGYtYmRhYi1lOWM0NzEyM2ZjZjQxNzM2OTA5OTI3Mjc3NzIxMDQ5NDktNTdhZTMyNGZhZTkxZjQ0ZTM5NjQiLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMDhkOWZkYWQtOWYxMS00OGIxLWFhYTctODgzYzQ1NDM1NGUyMS0xNzM2OTA5OTI3Mjc3NzIxMDQ5NDktMjVkM2NiYzJhZmRiZjA5NDM5NjQiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmcifQ==
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know