Are H and σ Tensions Generic to Present Cosmological Data?
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 876, Issue: 2
2019
- 28Citations
- 27Usage
- 21Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations28
- Citation Indexes27
- 27
- CrossRef18
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Usage27
- Downloads27
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Our Universe Isn't as Clumpy as It Used to Be, And That's a Real Problem
A big problem concerning the Universe's dark matter has just grown a little more intense. Observations of the more recent Universe reveal that this elusive
Article Description
Yes, for a wide range of cosmological models (ΛCDM, non-interacting w CDM, w WDM, or a class of interacting DMDE). Recently there have been attempts to solve the tension between direct measurements of H and from respective low-redshift observables and indirect measurements of these quantities from observations of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). In this work we construct a quasi-model-independent framework that reduces to different classes of cosmological models under suitable choices of parameters. We test this parameterization against the latest Planck CMB data combined with recent measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and supernovae, and direct measurements of H . Our analysis reveals that a strong positive correlation between H and σ is more or less generic for most of the cosmological models. The present data slightly prefer a phantom equation of state for dark energy and a slightly negative effective equation of state for dark matter (a direct signature of interacting models), with a relatively high H consistent with Planck+R16 data and simultaneously a consistent . Thus, even though the tensions cannot be fully resolved, a class of interacting models with phantom w get a slight edge over w CDM for the present data. However, although they may resolve the tension between high-redshift CMB data and individual low-redshift data sets, these data sets have inconsistencies between them (e.g., between BAO and H , supernovae and BAO, and cluster counts and H ).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067276170&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d6; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d6; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/journal-articles/841; https://digitalcommons.isical.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2595&context=journal-articles; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab12d6; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=a0765616-bd2a-4dcb-8505-e59c28a39937&ssb=04548259500&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fab12d6&ssi=a6868b5b-cnvj-4e85-91b4-078ef344dd55&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=174576068155713249511482237638084979&ssn=72d1c69b6c269b7250d176b4722616e913250900c3c4-8990-4f21-aee7f0&sso=f77aff8c-bc564dd29deafac12173f401920bab1c56cbdcdeec1e2838&ssp=88239914961726538749172729570958782&ssq=53993093905347909238229239626523711571796&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNzA5ODE0MDAwLTdmMjBjOTZmMjQ3OWVmMTM5NTA5MjMiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlMTAtMTcyNjUyOTIzOTQ1MzcwOTgxNDAwMC02MTQ1OGJiNDlhZmJiNzZlOTUwODI0In0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know