The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VII. The Distance to M101 via the Optical Tip of the Red Giant Branch Method
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 885, Issue: 2
2019
- 37Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program (CCHP) is building a direct path to the Hubble constant (H ) using Population II stars as the calibrator of the Type Ia supernova (SN Ia)-based distance scale. This path to calibrate the SNe Ia is independent of the systematics in the traditional Cepheid-based technique. In this paper, we present the distance to M101, the host to SN 2011fe, using the I-band tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) based on observations from the ACS/WFC instrument on the Hubble Space Telescope. The CCHP targets the halo of M101, where there is little to no host galaxy dust, the red giant branch is isolated from nearly all other stellar populations, and there is virtually no source confusion or crowding at the magnitude of the tip. Applying the standard procedure for the TRGB method from the other works in the CCHP series, we find a foreground-extinction-corrected M101 distance modulus of μ = 29.07 ± 0.04 ± 0.05 mag, which corresponds to a distance of D = 6.52 ± 0.12 ± 0.15 Mpc. This result is consistent with several recent Cepheid-based determinations, suggesting agreement between Population I and II distance scales for this nearby SN Ia host galaxy. We further analyze four archival data sets for M101 that have targeted its outer disk to argue that targeting in the stellar halo provides much more reliable distance measurements from the TRGB method owing to the combination of multiple structural components and heavy population contamination. Application of the TRGB in complex regions will have sources of uncertainty not accounted for in commonly used uncertainty measurement techniques.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85075278674&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4263; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4263; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab4263; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=fd27d203-8d2e-4f6e-8dc4-f9f660fb5f3f&ssb=80786296388&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fab4263&ssi=f8451b93-cnvj-4182-9b4a-e9c69a19af8d&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=2381526976090506585369812331505133&ssn=79521d12935ed8a0bbb4faf777b923c5ebdd1bcddbfa-b2e6-4a73-93a04f&sso=b3f4511c-e6be629105801beace40e774d17d94c1d7672d1bc04e5fe6&ssp=35366967581739307109173949831573528&ssq=34277515144914446193079322592298365086241&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwODczZGY4ZmMtMDBkZC00MzI3LThlZGYtZWU0N2FlMDJiNzBkMi0xNzM5Mzc5MzIyOTI0NzIxMjcwMDUtNzkxODI0MWY2ZDc5MWI2ODg1MzYiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3Nzc5OWExMy1kOTFlLTQwODctYjJiZC05ODQ4ZDkxOTRhNjMxNzM5Mzc5MzIyOTI0NzIxMjcwMDUtOGI2ZTAwOTcxMTgzOWI2Nzg1MzYifQ==
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know