On the XUV Luminosity Evolution of TRAPPIST-1
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 891, Issue: 2
2020
- 24Citations
- 33Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
We May Not Be Ruling Out Finding Life Around TRAPPIST-1 After All
The frequently changing tale of the quest for life in the most studied planetary system beyond our own has had another twist, this one in
Article Description
We model the long-term X-ray and ultraviolet (XUV) luminosity of TRAPPIST-1 to constrain the evolving high-energy radiation environment experienced by its planetary system. Using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method, we derive probabilistic constraints for TRAPPIST-1's stellar and XUV evolution that account for observational uncertainties, degeneracies between model parameters, and empirical data of low-mass stars. We constrain TRAPPIST-1's mass to m = 0.089 ± 0.001 M and find that its early XUV luminosity likely saturated at . From the posterior distribution, we infer that there is a ∼40% chance that TRAPPIST-1 is still in the saturated phase today, suggesting that TRAPPIST-1 has maintained high activity and L /L ≈ 10 for several gigayears. TRAPPIST-1's planetary system therefore likely experienced a persistent and extreme XUV flux environment, potentially driving significant atmospheric erosion and volatile loss. The inner planets likely received XUV fluxes ∼10-10 times that of the modern Earth during TRAPPIST-1's ∼1 Gyr long pre-main-sequence phase. Deriving these constraints via MCMC is computationally nontrivial, so scaling our methods to constrain the XUV evolution of a larger number of M dwarfs that harbor terrestrial exoplanets would incur significant computational expenses. We demonstrate that approxposterior, an open source Python machine learning package for approximate Bayesian inference using Gaussian processes, accurately and efficiently replicates our analysis using 980 times less computational time and 1330 times fewer simulations than MCMC sampling using emcee. We find that approxposterior derives constraints with mean errors on the best-fit values and 1σ uncertainties of 0.61% and 5.5%, respectively, relative to emcee.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084033153&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab77ad; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab77ad; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab77ad; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=b306ea50-d32c-4c4c-ba51-eb3b7cc82914&ssb=20701248255&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fab77ad&ssi=10dd8e81-cnvj-4576-8a7d-7ff84d1bc1da&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=32352549176872363189734280573238184&ssn=907462366f9568b7e35c5cf230c5996031281bcddbfa-b2e6-4a73-9ecc88&sso=1177011c-e6be6291058072ee8571fb72a38ef04477b82f66ce1273d0&ssp=52503072471739356994173968367458420&ssq=15589396725183273714779322522232648661464&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwODczZGY4ZmMtMDBkZC00MzI3LThlZGYtZWU0N2FlMDJiNzBkNS0xNzM5Mzc5MzIyOTI0Mjg3OTI4NzM0LTlkN2ZiZWM2MWY3MDZhNmYxODk3MyIsIl9fdXptZiI6IjdmNjAwMDc3Nzk5YTEzLWQ5MWUtNDA4Ny1iMmJkLTk4NDhkOTE5NGE2MzE3MzkzNzkzMjI5MjQyODc5Mjg3MzQtZGZmOGQ2NTAwMTYzZjM3MDE4OTczIn0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know