The ALPINE-ALMA [C II] Survey: [C II] 158 μm Emission Line Luminosity Functions at z ∼ 4-6
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 905, Issue: 2
2020
- 29Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We present the [C II] 158 μm line luminosity functions (LFs) at z ∼ 4-6 using the ALMA observations of 118 sources, which are selected to have UV luminosity M 1500Å <-20.2 and optical spectroscopic redshifts in COSMOS and ECDF-S. Of the 118 targets, 75 have significant [C II] detections and 43 are upper limits. This is by far the largest sample of [C II] detections, which allows us to set constraints on the volume density of [C II] emitters at z ∼ 4-6. But because this is a UV-selected sample, we are missing [C II]-bright but UV-faint sources, making our constraints strict lower limits. Our derived LFs are statistically consistent with the z ∼ 0 [C II] LF at 108.25-109.75 L o˙. We compare our results with the upper limits of the [C II] LF derived from serendipitous sources in the ALPINE maps. We also infer the [C II] LFs based on published far-IR and CO LFs at z ∼ 4-6. Combining our robust lower limits with these additional estimates, we set further constraints on the true number density of [C II] emitters at z ∼ 4-6. These additional LF estimates are largely above our LF at L [CII] > 109 L o˙, suggesting that UV-faint but [C II]-bright sources likely make significant contributions to the [C II] emitter volume density. When we include all the LF estimates, we find that available model predictions underestimate the number densities of [C II] emitters at z ∼ 4-6. Finally, we set a constraint on the molecular gas mass density at z ∼ 4-6, with ρ mol ∼ (2-7) × 107 M o˙ Mpc-3. This is broadly consistent with previous studies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098892183&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc41c; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/abc41c; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc41c; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=a60eb71c-d975-4661-b999-ef9e3348cd41&ssb=42132297061&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fabc41c&ssi=3c4f73f3-cnvj-4cf9-a940-3dedf4e71e6d&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=2194494250872042564902646825690807&ssn=60cbbe17314fc359edca3c6d28052af07facdf9f3776-e6a8-45b6-a9c0c8&sso=f1562892-40540c8f09fabc329a087ef15c94048e111d83366866c0ec&ssp=00066229371725009364172535470122983&ssq=56973950430349622155090140798713123757999&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMjQ4NjExMzgtYzM4Mi00NGU1LTk0ODYtNzAxNTllMDI4YTFkMy0xNzI1MDkwMTQwOTk2MjE0MTYyNTA3LTU0ODM1ZWUwNTdlZGQ5MDg2NDkwIiwiX191em1mIjoiN2Y2MDAwZWJkM2NhNTItNzg4OC00N2U1LWFjN2MtMDAwNDMwZWVlNDMyMTcyNTA5MDE0MDk5NjIxNDE2MjUwNy1jOGRmZWY2MWYyM2RjOTE1NjQ5MCJ9
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know