One-dimensional Numerical Study on Ignition of the Helium Envelope in Dynamical Accretion during the Double-degenerate Merger
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 941, Issue: 1
2022
- 5Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In order for a double-detonation model to be viable for normal type Ia supernovae, the adverse impact of helium-burning ash on early time observables has to be avoided, which requires that the helium envelope mass should be at most 0.02 M . Most of the previous studies introduced detonation by artificial hot spots, and therefore the robustness of the spontaneous helium detonation remains uncertain. In the present work, we conduct a self-consistent hydrodynamic study on the spontaneous ignition of the helium envelope in the context of the double-degenerate channel, by applying an idealized one-dimensional model and a simplified seven-isotope reaction network. We explore a wide range of the progenitor conditions and demonstrate that the chance of direct initiation of detonation is limited. Especially, the spontaneous detonation requires the primary envelope mass of ≳0.03 M . Ignition as deflagration is instead far more likely, which is feasible for the lower envelope mass down to ∼0.01 M , which might lead to subsequent detonation once the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) is realized. High-resolution multidimensional simulations are required to further investigate the DDT possibility, as well as accurately derive the threshold between the spontaneous detonation and deflagration ignition regimes. Another interesting finding is the effect of the composition: while mixing with the core material enhances detonation as previously suggested, it rather narrows the chance for deflagration due to the slower rate of the C(α,γ)O reaction at the lower temperature ∼10K, with the caveat that we presently neglect the proton-catalyzed reaction sequence of C(p,γ)O(α,p)O.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85144347614&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aca013; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/aca013; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aca013; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=3d34072e-633e-44dc-9867-15c9b4073ba6&ssb=37248255747&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Faca013&ssi=1dd70dd0-cnvj-4844-9a9e-6b63e1503d6f&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=58433355760622697162704373254332569&ssn=e9aad50c329537ad1d7935c341d82008b3103460dc2c-6ee3-420f-b1f4c6&sso=ebb861ed-b2e6616f70eb926033b8f1cb10cb3c9b4cf0d9f6f20ed47c&ssp=15186507101725340064172585401938230&ssq=27854512428187895651418888251135315672967&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA1ZGE5MzUzMS1kNzliLTQ1MWEtYWMwNi00OTFhYzQxOWZjNGYxNzI1MzE4ODg4NTM3NTA1MzkyNTI3LWY2NGExNGQ3NDk3YmY4MzYxNjI3MCIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDAwYzMzYzZiYi1mMzAyLTQ4NmQtODgzNi01OTAyYThhYWVhZGU3LTE3MjUzMTg4ODg1Mzc1MDUzOTI1MjctMTNhZWZlZmQ3NGQwZmI4YzE2MjcwIiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know