A Comparison of Particle-in-cell and Hybrid Simulations of the Heliospheric Termination Shock
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 959, Issue: 1
2023
- 4Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We compare hybrid (kinetic proton, fluid electron) and particle-in-cell (kinetic proton, kinetic electron) simulations of the solar wind termination shock with parameters similar to those observed by Voyager 2 during its crossing. The steady-state results show excellent agreement between the downstream variations in the density, plasma velocity, and magnetic field. The quasi-perpendicular shock accelerates interstellar pickup ions to a maximum energy limited by the size of the computational domain, with somewhat higher fluxes and maximal energies observed in the particle-in-cell simulation, likely due to differences in the cross-shock electric field arising from electron kinetic-scale effects. The higher fluxes may help address recent discrepancies noted between observations and large-scale hybrid simulations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178151842&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad03e2; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad03e2; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad03e2; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=e0d9704b-847a-42fa-bc12-a3d157f171be&ssb=20524255356&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fad03e2&ssi=d533a517-cnvj-44b7-8e73-512852c005f8&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=22066710944891827210971299272987773&ssn=c6e8217acae1ac9b90948cfebb5ab8b7b30f3460dc2c-6ee3-420f-b1d867&sso=dd73b1ed-b2e6616f70eb899ed6a0b3381395a6aeb166b165282318b7&ssp=03904180061725340752172592345677186&ssq=23908575348219086884118888825413582023360&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA1ZGE5MzUzMS1kNzliLTQ1MWEtYWMwNi00OTFhYzQxOWZjNGYxNzI1MzE4ODg4NTM3NjM0NTk0MzMyLWI0NTc2MDU5OGVmOTY0OWIyMTA5NCIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDAwYzMzYzZiYi1mMzAyLTQ4NmQtODgzNi01OTAyYThhYWVhZGU5LTE3MjUzMTg4ODg1Mzc2MzQ1OTQzMzItMTI4Y2JmYTlkNjg5Mjk0ZjIxMDk0In0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know