A Multiwavelength Machine-learning Approach to Classifying X-Ray Sources in the Fields of Unidentified 4FGL-DR4 Sources
Astrophysical Journal, ISSN: 1538-4357, Vol: 971, Issue: 2
2024
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A large fraction of Fermi-Large Area Telescope (LAT) sources in the fourth Fermi-LAT 14 yr catalog (4FGL) still remain unidentified (unIDed). We continued to improve our machine-learning pipeline and used it to classify 1206 X-ray sources with signal-to-noise ratios >3 located within the extent of 73 unIDed 4FGL sources with Chandra X-ray Observatory observations included in the Chandra Source Catalog 2.0. Recent improvements to our pipeline include astrometric corrections, probabilistic cross-matching to lower-frequency counterparts, and a more realistic oversampling method. X-ray sources are classified into eight broad predetermined astrophysical classes defined in the updated training data set, which we also release. We present details of the machine-learning classification, describe the pipeline improvements, and perform an additional spectral and variability analysis for brighter sources. The classifications give 103 plausible X-ray counterparts to 42 GeV sources. We identify 2 GeV sources as isolated neutron star candidates, 16 as active galactic nucleus candidates, seven as sources associated with star-forming regions, and eight as ambiguous cases. For the remaining 40 unIDed 4FGL sources, we could not identify any plausible counterpart in X-rays, or they are too close to the Galactic Center. Finally, we outline the observational strategies and further improvements in the pipeline that can lead to more accurate classifications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201710126&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad543e; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ad543e; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad543e; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=7fd77ee5-c63a-41c4-8f0f-7840b4b48585&ssb=32344279313&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2F1538-4357%2Fad543e&ssi=7088c660-cnvj-4aab-b777-99bcc615493b&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=9686389303076183372852719418155710&ssn=419c5f7b663b36fcb494dd816d8739aad953bfa5c2a5-3bc8-4051-8c473b&sso=669b62ef-1734209401aec3be79588f04d13435e9fe978f1326976b99&ssp=29681466241724644726172480159118693&ssq=96306370203489073590197749976717576096964&ssr=MzQuMjM2LjI2LjMx&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNWUwMmRiOC0xMGZlLTQ2ZWUtYmYzMC04M2YxMTcwMTgwNWUxNzI0Njk3NzQ5MTgwMTA0Mjg1MjMxLThmZTJiOGMxZTc4OWFkNmQ3Mjg1IiwidXpteCI6IjdmOTAwMGE5ZWYwZjg3LWJjOWUtNDk4Yi05MWU5LTY1MWNhY2NlZjliODItMTcyNDY5Nzc0OTE4MDEwNDI4NTIzMS0wYzA1YjgwYWM1Y2EzNjBjNzI4MiJ9
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know