The visual lightcurve of comet C/1995 O1 (Hale–Bopp) from 1995 to 1999
Planetary Science Journal, ISSN: 2632-3338, Vol: 2, Issue: 1
2021
- 6Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
The great comet C/1995 O1 (Hale–Bopp) presented a remarkable opportunity to study its long-term brightness over four years. We used 2240 observations published in the International Comet Quarterly from 17 observers during 1995 July to 1999 September to create a secular lightcurve. In order to account for observer differences, we present a novel algorithm to reduce scatter and increase precision in a lightcurve compiled from many sources. It is implemented in a publicly available code, ICQSPLITTER, which uses a self-consistent statistical approach. To first order, the comet’s lightcurve approximates an r response for both pre- and postperihelion distances. The preperihelion data are better fit with a fifth-order polynomial with inflection points at 4.0, 2.6, 2.1, and 1.1 au, some of which are associated with physical changes in the coma. Outbursts may have occurred a few days before perihelion and at ∼2.2 and 7.4 au postperihelion. The Afρ values derived from the final magnitudes are consistent with an r dependence on heliocentric distance and are within a factor of 2–4 of those derived from spectroscopy and narrowband photometry. We present correlation equations for visual magnitudes and CO and HO production rates that are consistent with the preperihelion brightness increasing due to CO outgassing until about 2.6–3.0 au from the Sun and then are strongly correlated with HO production rates. We also present two generalized correlation equations that may be useful for observation planning and data analysis with the James Webb Space Telescope and other observatories.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85103325406&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/psj/abd32c; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/PSJ/abd32c; https://dx.doi.org/10.3847/psj/abd32c; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=7d1cac18-bf27-4e12-b247-c59369e9a372&ssb=14788206479&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.3847%2FPSJ%2Fabd32c&ssi=821e5c7d-cnvj-42f9-b07b-188644e8e15f&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=42794572762963156962802687942021154&ssn=9ad9d8f57614437f36392eb356a266a54aa46402f074-4cb6-43cc-b8447c&sso=56c105d5-86644739f8a502c2e458b7b14cb6c0b7aef6784272c84264&ssp=20590693661728658712172925571342598&ssq=76352086535658889912275883006548450248613&ssr=MzQuMjM2LjI2LjMx&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDAwMTkwYjQzMC04NzFlLTRjOGEtODhjNS1hOTI5ZGQ5NTBhYzkxNzI4Njc1ODgzNDM1NTg5NDczMDAxLTg4NjgwMDgyMzJlMDZhNzg5NjI3MSIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDA1MjAyNTk2Ny04NzMxLTQ5ZGUtODY0OC1jY2U1NWI5ZTRiYWM4LTE3Mjg2NzU4ODM0MzY1ODk0NzMwMDAtYzQxMTBhZGRmMGQyMzJlNjk2MjY4In0=
American Astronomical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know