Evaluation of Repellency of Stop the BitesBotanical Pesticide to White-Tailed Deer at Corn Feeders
Southwestern Entomologist, ISSN: 0147-1724, Vol: 47, Issue: 2, Page: 277-283
2022
- 4Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Stop the Bites® botanical pesticide was evaluated for repellent properties against white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus (Zimmerman), at feeders with supplemental corn, Zea mays L., in Cameron County, Texas. The pesticide was tested as a ground treatment around feeders and as spray applied directly to deer as they consumed corn at supplemental feeders. With either treatment, there was no significant difference in numbers of white-tailed deer at the feeders compared to the paired nontreated check. The botanical pesticide may be useful for treatment of cattle fever ticks (Rhipicephalus microplus (Canestrini) and Rhipicephalus annulatus (Say)) on deer at supplemental corn feeders during the hunting season when ivermectin-treated corn is withdrawn, or for treatment using a remotely operated sprayer at fence crossings for tick-infested nilgai, Boselaphus tragocamelus (Pallas).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85132771692&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3958/059.047.0202; https://bioone.org/journals/southwestern-entomologist/volume-47/issue-2/059.047.0202/Evaluation-of-Repellency-of-Stop-the-Bites-Botanical-Pesticide-to/10.3958/059.047.0202.full; https://dx.doi.org/10.3958/059.047.0202; https://bioone.org/access-suspended
Society of Southwestern Entomologists
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know