Life cycle analysis in concrete blocks: comparison of the impact produced between traditional blocks and blocks made with by-products
Informes de la Construccion, ISSN: 1988-3234, Vol: 74, Issue: 566, Page: 1-11
2022
- 3Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Reusing by-products for the development of concrete blocks that are more sustainable and with better thermal properties, for the building sector is a necessity and a good alternative to develop in the construction sector. A life cycle analysis (LCA) was performed on the blocks with and without by-products, in order to quantify the environmental benefits that the incorporation of these by-products in the blocks would entail. The LCA was carried out in accordance with the provisions of EN-ISO 15804, which establishes the calculation rules for the analysis of construction products. This analysis was performed using the “Eco-it” software tool, with a scope from cradle to gate. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the partial replacement of fine aggregate by shavings and cement by lime sludge in the mix is an alternative way to obtain blocks that are more respectful with the environment and in turn with better thermal properties.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know