Finding out biological terms from texts with CRFs for reinforcement learning
Applied Mechanics and Materials, ISSN: 1660-9336, Vol: 198-199, Page: 1345-1350
2012
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The rapid growth of biological texts promotes the study of text mining which focuses on mining biological knowledge in various unstructured documents. Meanwhile, most biological text mining efforts are based on identifying biological terms such as gene and protein names. Therefore, how to identify biological terms effectively from text has become one of the important problems in bioinformatics. Conditional random fields (CRFs), an important machine learning algorithm, are graphical models for modeling the probability of labels given the observations. They have traditionally been trained with using a set of observation and label pairs. Here we use CRFs in a class of temporal learning algorithms, reinforcement learning. Consequently the labels are actions that update the environment and affect the next observation. As a result, from the view of reinforcement learning, CRFs provide a way to model joint actions in a decentralized Markov decision process, which define how agents can communicate with each other to choose the optimal joint action. We use GENIA corpus to carry on training and testing the proposed approach. The result showed the system could find out biological terms from texts effectively. We get average precision rate=90.8%, average recall rate=90.6%, and average F1 rate=90.6% on six classes of biological terms. The results are pretty better than many other biological named entity recognition systems. © (2012) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84869211592&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.198-199.1345; https://www.scientific.net/AMM.198-199.1345; https://www.scientific.net/AMM.198-199.1345.pdf; http://www.scientific.net/AMM.198-199.1345; http://www.scientific.net/AMM.198-199.1345.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.198-199.1345
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know