Antibacterial properties among different concentration of bioactive glasses
Key Engineering Materials, ISSN: 1662-9795, Vol: 814 KEM, Page: 349-353
2019
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The objective of this study was to evaluate the antibacterial properties and pH changes of bioactive glasses and zinc oxide nanowire in different concentrations. Bioactive glasses (45S5 and 45S5F) were prepared in three concentrations of 10, 20, and 50 mg/ml and zinc oxide nanowire was prepared in 1 and 5 mg/ml concentrations. The materials were exposed to 500 ml brain heart infusion broth (BHI) with 1.5 x 10 of S.mutans and S.sanguinis separately. Antibacterial properties were tested indirectly by collecting 100 ml of each sample and transferred into a 96 well-plate. The optical density (OD) was evaluated using spectrophotometry at 630 nm at 24h and 48h. The pH changes were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis tests. The result showed that the pH changes were significantly different in the Bioactive glass samples, while zinc oxide nanowire showed stable pH. Antibacterial activity against S.mutans was significant lower for 45S5 at 50 mg/ml, 45S5F and zinc oxide nanowire in all concentrations at 24 h. While in 48 h, 45S5, 45S5F and zinc oxide nanowire showed significant antibacterial activity in all concentration except 45S5F at 10 mg/ml. Antibacterial activity against S.sanguinis was significant for 45S5 and 45S5F at 20 and 50 mg/ml and zinc oxide nanowire in all concentration at 48h. It can be concluded that Bioactive glasses (45S5 and 45S5F) exhibited antibacterial properties and pH changes depending on its concentration, while zinc oxide nanowire exhibited antibacterial properties at low concentrations with a constant pH value.
Bibliographic Details
Trans Tech Publications, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know