Facilitative interpersonal skills are relevant in child therapy too, so why don't we measure them?
Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, ISSN: 2239-8031, Vol: 25, Issue: 1, Page: 145-157
2022
- 6Citations
- 32Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef2
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
Article Description
One of the consistent findings from psychotherapy process research has been the impact of therapist effects on patient change an the therapeutic alliance. The Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS) paradigm is a task in which participants respond to standardize videos of actors playing patients in interpersonally challenging moments as if they were the therapist, which was designed to asses therapist effects. Participants' video recorded responses are coded for eight skills: verbal fluency, emotional expressiveness, warmth/ac ceptance/understanding, empathy, persuasiveness, hope/positive expectations, alliance-bond capacity, and rupture-repair responsiveness Performance-based procedures like the FIS minimize self-report bias and systematically control for client-related variability while main taining strong clinical relevance. Research has shown that therapist FIS predicts the quality of the therapeutic alliance and outcome i adult psychotherapy. This paper describes the development and first adaptation of the FIS task using child and adolescent patients a the stimuli, and reports findings from a pilot study testing the reliability. The FIS-Child (FIS-C) task was administered to 10 therapist with a range of clinical backgrounds. Participants also completed the original FIS task and self-report measures of their empathy, socia skills, and playfulness. Adequate interrater reliability was achieved on the FIS-C. There were no significant differences between par ticipants' ratings on the FIS-C compared to the original FIS, although there were minor differences in the correlations between the FIS C and self-report measures compared to the original FIS. Findings support moving forward with utilizing the FIS-C to empirically stud therapist effects that may be common factors across treatment models.
Bibliographic Details
PAGEPress Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know