Glucocorticoid‑free Treatment of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Is it Feasible?
Indian Journal of Rheumatology, ISSN: 0973-3698, Vol: 18, Issue: 1S, Page: S12-S24
2023
- 1Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the mainstay of treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) more than 60 years after their discovery. Despite their effectiveness in controlling disease activity, the long‑term use of GC often causes side effects that increase morbidity and mortality in SLE patients. Evidence from randomized controlled trials on the appropriate dosing and tapering of GC in SLE is scarce. Historically, high doses of GC were used in the treatment of SLE. Fortunately, there are emerging data showing a lower dose of GC is equally effective compared to a higher GC in controlling disease activity and has fewer adverse effects. The introduction of various GC‑sparing immunosuppressive (IS) treatments such as cyclophosphamide (CYC), azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, and biologic agents has assisted in reducing the GC doses in SLE. The aims of this narrative review are to give an overview on the GC mechanisms of actions, the strategies to reduce GC‑related toxicity, the evidence of low GC dose protocols and finally to discuss the viability of GC‑free treatment of SLE.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180303009&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/injr.injr_97_22; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.4103/injr.injr_97_22; https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/injr.injr_97_22; https://journals.lww.com/ijru/fulltext/2023/18001/glucocorticoid_free_treatment_of_systemic_lupus.3.aspx
SAGE Publications
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know