Assessing the impact of a respiratory care bundle on health status and quality of life of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in Jordan: A quasi‑experimental study
Journal of Education and Health Promotion, ISSN: 2319-6440, Vol: 13, Issue: 1, Page: 191-null
2024
- 12Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Researcher at Applied Science Private University Releases New Data on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Assessing the impact of a respiratory care bundle on health status and quality of life of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ...)
2024 JUL 23 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Respiratory Therapeutics Daily News -- A new study on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Article Description
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a respiratory care bundle, including deep breathing exercises, incentive spirometry, and airway clearance techniques, on the quality of life (QoL) of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients in Jordan. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A quasi‑experimental study design and convenience sampling method was used to recruit 120 COPD patients, with 54 in the intervention group and 66 in the control group. The intervention group received additional respiratory care bundle training, while the control group received only discharge instructions and an education program. The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ‑C) was used to assess participants’ QoL before and after the intervention. Independent t‑tests, paired t‑tests, and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The study found no significant differences between patients’ characteristics, health status, and SGRQ‑C scores between the two groups at baseline. After the intervention, there were statistically significant differences in all SGRQ‑C subscales, which were lower in the intervention group compared to the control group. The paired t‑test showed significant reductions in all SGRQ‑C symptoms components (t = 7.62, P < .001), activity component (t = 7.58, P < .001), impact component (t = 7.56, P < .001), and total scores post‑intervention (t = 7.52, P < .001) for the intervention group. The ANCOVA analysis showed significant differences in scores of SGRQ‑C components and total scores (f = 11.3, P < .001) post‑intervention between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The study’s findings suggest that providing additional respiratory care bundle training for COPD patients can significantly improve their QoL, as measured by the SGRQ‑C scores. The respiratory care bundle intervention was effective in reducing COPD symptoms and improving the QoL of COPD patients. Healthcare providers should consider implementing respiratory care bundles as part of COPD management to improve patients’ outcomes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200112892&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1110_23; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39268425; https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1110_23; https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1110_23; https://journals.lww.com/jehp/fulltext/2024/07050/assessing_the_impact_of_a_respiratory_care_bundle.191.aspx
Medknow
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know