Monte carlo study on dose distributions around 192 Ir, 169 Yb, and 125 i brachytherapy sources using EGSnrc-based egs-brachy user-code
Journal of Medical Physics, ISSN: 1998-3913, Vol: 47, Issue: 3, Page: 270-278
2022
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Introduction/: As per the recommendations of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 43, Monte Carlo (MC) investigators should reproduce previously published dose distributions whenever new features of the code are explored. The purpose of the present study is to benchmark the TG-43 dosimetric parameters calculated using the new MC user-code egs_brachy of EGSnrc code system for three different radionuclides 192 Ir, 169 Yb, and 125 I which represent high-, intermediate-, and low-energy sources, respectively. Materials and Methods: Brachytherapy sources investigated in this study are high-dose rate (HDR) 192 Ir VariSource (Model VS2000), 169 Yb HDR (Model 4140), and 125 I-low-dose-rate (LDR) (Model OcuProsta). The TG-43 dosimetric parameters such as air-kerma strength, S k, dose rate constant, Λ, radial dose function, g(r) and anisotropy function, F(r,θ) and two-dimensional (2D) absorbed dose rate data (along-Away table) are calculated in a cylindrical water phantom of mass density 0.998 g/cm 3 using the MC code egs_brachy. Dimensions of phantom considered for 192 Ir VS2000 and 169 Yb sources are 80 cm diameter ×80 cm height, whereas for 125 I OcuProsta source, 30 cm diameter ×30 cm height cylindrical water phantom is considered for MC calculations. Results: The dosimetric parameters calculated using egs_brachy are compared against the values published in the literature. The calculated values of dose rate constants from this study agree with the published values within statistical uncertainties for all investigated sources. Good agreement is found between the egs_brachy calculated radial dose functions, g(r), anisotropy functions, and 2D dose rate data with the published values (within 2%) for the same phantom dimensions. For 192 Ir VS2000 source, difference of about 28% is observed in g(r) value at 18 cm from the source which is due to differences in the phantom dimensions. Conclusion: The study validates TG-43 dose parameters calculated using egs_brachy for 192 Ir, 169 Yb, and 125 I brachytherapy sources with the values published in the literature.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85142700053&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_16_22; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36684701; https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jmp.jmp_16_22; https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_16_22; https://journals.lww.com/jomp/fulltext/2022/47030/monte_carlo_study_on_dose_distributions_around.8.aspx
Medknow
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know