Target Coverage and Network Connectivity Challenges in Wireless Sensor Networks
EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, ISSN: 2032-944X, Vol: 8, Issue: 31, Page: 1-15
2021
- 3Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Target Coverage and Network Connectivity in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) plays a momentous role in the field of monitoring environment, habitant observing, disaster recovery, surveillance, etc. Coverage and Network Connectivity collectively can be considered as a proportion of Quality of Service (QoS) in a sensor network. It implies the coverage of each point in the detecting field while in the meantime fulfilling the measure that each node is surrounded by the equivalent neighbourhood of at least one other node. Many primary issues influence the outline and performance of WSN. A Comprehensive survey is made based on the scheduling algorithm and set cover approach, in which we analyze various approaches and their algorithm complexity. Firstly, the scheduling algorithm intermittently provides the required data service with guaranteed efficiency. This methodology can efficiently reduce the entire number of active nodes in the network, resulting in maximizing the network lifetime. Secondly, the set cover approach plays a major role in solving target coverage problem which group sensors into each cover set thereby, target coverage was achieved. Typical issues and open research challenges are addressed by classifying the approaches available in literature into three broad categories namely, adaptable coverage radius, coverage deployment strategy, and sleep scheduling. This survey aims to provide a better perceptive of the existing open challenges and possible futuristic approaches for target coverage and network connectivity in wireless sensor networks.
Bibliographic Details
European Alliance for Innovation n.o.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know