Challenges and opportunities in the delivery of cancer therapeutics
Therapeutic Delivery, ISSN: 2041-6008, Vol: 2, Issue: 1, Page: 107-121
2011
- 4Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef4
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Review Description
The idea that cancer is not one but many diseases has completely changed the oncology landscape and promoted the development of personalized cancer therapy. Based on a better understanding of the mechanisms of cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth, novel therapies have emerged to address unmet medical needs and effectively treat pre-identified, responsive patients. These novel therapies require specific drug-delivery strategies that depend on the type and location of cancer, as well as the type of drugs administered, that is, a small molecule, a peptide, a therapeutic protein or a monoclonal antibody. Systemic cancer drugs are administered through three major routes that show different challenges with regard to delivery: these are oral administration, intravenous infusion and subcutaneous injection. This review presents and discusses the challenges and opportunities of the drug-delivery systems for each of these administration routes. It will be shown that, for the good of the patients, every time a drug-delivery system is used to administer anticancer drugs, the patients get a major benefit from that specific system: either improved efficacy, a better tolerability and toxicity profile, or even a combination of both effects. © 2011 Future Science Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know