Apartheid’s alcatraz: The barberton prison complex during the early 1980s - part one
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, ISSN: 1727-3781, Vol: 18, Issue: 2, Page: 275-305
2015
- 2,262Usage
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The purpose of this two-part article is to examine in detail the public discourse surrounding the Barberton Prison Complex during the early 1980s, at the height of the apartheid era. The prisons within the Barberton Prison Complex were notorious as being among the most punitive of the many prisons within apartheid South Africa. Barberton was the place to which the most dangerous and intractable prisoners were sent to serve their sentences, making it apartheid's "Alcatraz". The focus of this article is on the treatment of "normal" as opposed to "political" prisoners during the period in question, allowing the "voices" of ordinary prisoners – often sidelined and silenced – to be brought to the fore. The Barberton Prison Complex is examined through the lens of public discourse, as reflected in a wide range of South African newspapers published at the time. By analysing a large number of reports dealing with events at Barberton during the period in question, in both English and Afrikaans language newspapers, as well as in both politically conservative and politically liberal newspapers, this article attempts to capture both the "smell" and the "feel" of what it was like to be imprisoned in one of apartheid's toughest prison complexes. Furthermore, this article seeks to show that – despite legislative measures restricting the publication of information on conditions inside apartheid prisons – the press was able to provide a steady stream of information to the South African public on the shocking events which occurred at Barberton during the period in question. Part One of this article deals with the deaths of three prisoners and the injury of many others during a day of violence at the Barberton prison farm on 29 December 1982, as well as the broader political implications of the criminal trial - known as the "heat exhaustion trial" - which followed. It is contended that the events surrounding the infamous "heat exhaustion trial" may be seen as a kind of metaphor for the apartheid system itself, as it began to unravel during the 1980s.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85035804943&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i2.07; https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/585; https://perjournal.co.za/article/download/585/446; https://perjournal.co.za/article/download/585/3101; https://perjournal.co.za/article/download/585/8427; http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-37812015000200008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1727-37812015000200008&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1727-37812015000200008; http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1727-37812015000200008; https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v18i2.07; http://www.ajol.info/index.php/pelj/article/view/121293; https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pelj/article/view/121293; https://www.ajol.info/index.php/pelj/article/download/121293/110724
Academy of Science of South Africa
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know