Caffeine removal and mass transfer in a nanofiltration membrane process
Desalination and Water Treatment, ISSN: 1944-3986, Vol: 59, Page: 1-10
2017
- 2Citations
- 8Usage
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef2
- Usage8
- Abstract Views8
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
The effectiveness of nanofiltration (NF) to remove a wide range of spiked caffeine (0.052–4,500 μg/L) from groundwater at the pilot-scale (60,636 L/h) has been demonstrated. Experiments were conducted using a pilot-scale unit, operating as a two-stage, split-feed, center-exit system that relied on a well supply withdrawn from an average depth of 45 m that contained an average of 11 mg/L of dissolved organic carbon. The average caffeine removal efficiency across the pilot system was 68%, and removal did not vary by solute concentration for constant flux (25.6 L m –2 h –1 ) and temperature (25°C) operating conditions. Mass transfer models evaluated in this work include the homogeneous solution diffusion model (HSDM) with and without film theory (FT), in addition to dimensional analysis, using the Sherwood number, and were shown to predict NF solute mass transfer. Predicted vs. actual caffeine content was linearly compared, revealing correlation coefficients on the order of 0.99, 0.96, and 0.99 for the HSDM without FT, HSDM-FT, and the Sherwood number, respectively. However, the use of the HSDM-FT and the Sherwood number resulted in the over-prediction of caffeine concentrations in permeate streams by 27% and 104%, respectively.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1944398624129979; http://dx.doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.11466; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85020180971&origin=inward; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1944398624129979; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/scopus2015/4730; https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5729&context=scopus2015
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know