PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Leadership learning design principles: Co-creating dialogic and critical pedagogy within cohort and community contexts

Dialogic Pedagogy, ISSN: 2325-3290, Vol: 11, Issue: 1, Page: A85-A107
2023
  • 0
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 27
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Captures
    27
  • Mentions
    1
    • News Mentions
      1
      • News
        1

Most Recent News

Studies from University of Colorado Denver Describe New Findings in Education (Leadership learning design principles: Co-creating dialogic and critical pedagogy within cohort and community contexts)

2023 JUL 28 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Education Daily Report -- Investigators publish new report on education. According to news

Article Description

The purpose of this paper is to share our pedagogical evolution as graduate faculty in relationship with increasingly diverse cohort communities of early childhood professionals learning across the landscape of leadership roles engaged with young children, families, and other adults. The early childhood leadership program described in this paper offers a graduate certificate where annually, a cohort of 18-22 early childhood professionals from across Colorado in the United States learn together for 13 months. As faculty, we share a strong commitment to both learning about our teaching and to inviting student voices, the early childhood professionals, through dialogic processes in participatory study as we co-learn and grow our practices of learning and teaching. This paper introduces and explores four leadership learning design principles: (1) identity and agency, (2) socially constructed pedagogy, (3) contextually relevant learning experience, and (4) appreciative stance. As we go, the story will unfold around how we engaged cohort members of the 2019-2020 program year through initial survey reflections and then deepening our shared understanding of these leadership learning design principles through iterations of dialogue after the program was concluded. We end the paper with reflections on how this process of study has ultimately brought us to an awareness and eagerness to engage in relational forms of inquiry, placing student voices at the center with even more intention and depth.

Bibliographic Details

Wendy B. Allen; Rebecca Vlasin; Lori G. Ryan

University Library System, University of Pittsburgh

Social Sciences; Arts and Humanities

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know