Increasing number of databases searched in systematic reviews and meta-analyses between 1994 and 2014
Journal of the Medical Library Association, ISSN: 1558-9439, Vol: 104, Issue: 4, Page: 284-289
2016
- 31Citations
- 60Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations31
- Citation Indexes31
- 31
- CrossRef4
- Captures60
- Readers60
- 59
Review Description
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the number of bibliographic databases used to search the health sciences literature in individual systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) changed over a twenty-year period related to the official 1995 launch of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR). Methods: Ovid MEDLINE was searched using a modified version of a strategy developed by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network to identify SRs and MAs. Records from 3 milestone years were searched: the year immediately preceding (1994) and 1 (2004) and 2 (2014) decades following the CDSR launch. Records were sorted with randomization software. Abstracts or full texts of the records were examined to identify database usage until 100 relevant records were identified from each of the 3 years. Results: The mean and median number of bibliographic databases searched in 1994, 2004, and 2014 were 1.62 and 1, 3.34 and 3, and 3.73 and 4, respectively. Studies that searched only 1 database decreased over the 3 milestone years (60% in 1994, 28% in 2004, and 10% in 2014). Conclusions: The number of bibliographic databases searched in individual SRs and MAs increased from 1994 to 2014.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84994744875&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.006; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27822149; http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/141; http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/viewFile/141/185; http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/viewFile/141/168; http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.141; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5079489/; https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.141; https://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/141; https://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/download/141/168
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know