Patron perception and utilization of an embedded librarian program
Journal of the Medical Library Association, ISSN: 1558-9439, Vol: 104, Issue: 3, Page: 226-230
2016
- 18Citations
- 66Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations18
- Citation Indexes18
- 18
- CrossRef3
- Academic Citation Index (ACI) - airiti1
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 57
Article Description
Objective: The study measured the perceived value of an academic library’s embedded librarian service model. Setting: The study took place at the health sciences campuses of a research institution. Methods: A web-based survey was distributed that asked respondents a series of questions about their utilization of and satisfaction with embedded librarians and services. Results: Over 58% of respondents reported being aware of their embedded librarians, and 95% of these were satisfied with provided services. Conclusions: The overall satisfaction with services was encouraging, but awareness of the embedded program was low, suggesting an overall need for marketing of services.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84977139585&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.008; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27366124; http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/16; http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.16; http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/viewFile/16/43; http://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/viewFile/16/11; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915641/; https://dx.doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2016.16; https://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/view/16; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4915641/; https://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/download/16/11; https://jmla.pitt.edu/ojs/jmla/article/download/16/1867
University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know