Small Objects Manipulation in Immersive Virtual Reality
Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, ISSN: 2184-4321, Vol: 2, Page: 233-240
2022
- 5Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In this pilot study, we analyze how the user approaches the manipulation of small virtual objects using different technologies, such as the HTC Vive controllers, the Leap Motion, and the Manus Prime haptic gloves. The aim of the study is to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of the three devices in a pick-and-place and simple manipulation task, specifically the assembling of a three-dimensional object composed of several mechanical parts of different shapes and sizes. 12 subjects perform the proposed experiment in a within-subjects study. We measured the total time to complete the entire task, the partial timing and the errors as the number of objects lost, to understand which are the most difficult actions. Moreover, we analyze the user feelings with the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ), and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Both timing measurements and user experience reveal the weaknesses of the gloves, which suffer from problem in correctly tracking the thumb, thus in allowing grasping actions. Controllers are still a good compromise, though some fine tasks could not be correctly performed. The vision-based solution of the Leap Motion is appreciated by users, and it is stable enough to perform the given task.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180009884&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0010905200003124; https://www.scitepress.org/DigitalLibrary/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0010905200003124; https://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0010905200003124; https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0010905200003124
Scitepress
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know