Integration of Sustainable Production Criteria into Production Scheduling: A Systematic Search and a Critical Review
International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems, ISSN: 2184-4372, Vol: 1, Page: 58-69
2024
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures6
- Readers6
Conference Paper Description
Production scheduling plays a pivotal role in shaping and optimizing production processes to promote sustainability in manufacturing companies. Understanding how current studies consider sustainable production criteria in scheduling objectives can help companies transition from a reactive to a proactive production mode. This paper presents a systematic and critical analysis of 120 articles to examine the extent to which sustainable production criteria have been applied to scheduling problems in manufacturing systems. The analysis categorizes articles based on the type of scheduling problem, problem formulation, resolution method, and sustainability aspects considered, while also tracking the evolution of each sustainability indicator to identify trends. The study reveals the use of diverse sustainability indicators in production scheduling. Indicators such as "Makespan" and "Energy consumption" are prevalent, while social indicators related to employee well-being and safety are still emerging and rarely considered. Notable gaps identified in this review include the absence of real-world applications, unclear criteria for indicator selection, and limited holistic assessments linking production improvements to overall sustainability. The review emphasizes the need for practical and strategic approaches, serving as a guide for the manufacturing sector and informing future research directions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190370646&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0012306000003639; https://www.scitepress.org/DigitalLibrary/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0012306000003639; https://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0012306000003639; https://www.scitepress.org/Link.aspx?doi=10.5220/0012306000003639
Scitepress
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know