Fragments delivered by secondary craters at the Chang'e-4 landing site
2020
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
1. CE-4_Fresh_Crater_DEM.mat: The high-resolution DEM (5 mm/pixel) of the fresh crater and surrounding areas generated by the SfS method. 2. data_lpr_freshcrater.mat: The processed high-frequency CE-4 LPR radargram in the small crater. 3.day_8_11.mat: The processed high-frequency CE-4 LPR radargram from 8th to 11th lunar days shown in Figure 3. 4. Figure_2b.m: The Matlab code plots Figure 2b; 5. Figure_2c.m: The Matlab code for plotting the high-resolution DEM of the small crater and surrounding areas, the DEM data is before the shaded relief. 6.Figure_3.m: Code for imaging the LPR radargram from 8th to 11th the lunar days. 7. Figure_4.m: Code for comparison of the observed radargram between the navigation points 904–911 and the simulated radargrams. 8. Model_fig_4a.mat: Regolith model dataset of Figure 4a; 9. Model_fig_4b.mat: Regolith model dataset of Figure 4b; 10. Model_fig_4c.mat: Regolith model dataset of Figure 4c; 11. Model_fig_4d.mat: Regolith model dataset of Figure 4d; 12. Model_fig_4e.mat: Regolith model dataset of Figure 4e; 13.remove_background.m: Matlab code for background subtract. 14.Sim_fig_4a.mat. Corresponding simulated radargram of Figure 4a after amplitude compensation 15.Sim_fig_4b.mat. Corresponding simulated radargram of Figure 4b after amplitude compensation 16.Sim_fig_4c.mat. Corresponding simulated radargram of Figure 4c after amplitude compensation 17.Sim_fig_4d.mat. Corresponding simulated radargram of Figure 4d after amplitude compensation 18.Sim_fig_4e.mat. Corresponding simulated radargram of Figure 4e after amplitude compensation
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know