Fecal microbiota transplant for treatment of diarrhea in adult hospitalized horses—111 cases (2013–2018)
Open Veterinary Journal, ISSN: 2218-6050, Vol: 13, Issue: 9, Page: 1135-1140
2023
- 4Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef4
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Background: Fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is increasingly administered as part of the treatment of colitis in horses, yet there is little data as to its effectiveness. Aim: Retrospective evaluation of the effects of FMT on discharge status, fecal consistency, length of hospitalization, and improvement in clinical signs in horses hospitalized for diarrhea. Methods: Retrospective case-control study. Medical records of adult horses (>1 year old) that received at least one transfaunation treatment (2013–2018) in two referral hospitals were identified through a medical records database search. Medical records of contemporary adult horses with diarrhea who did not receive FMT at the same study centers were used as controls. Results: Control horses had statistically significant shorter hospitalization [7 (1–21)] as compared to the transfaunation group [12 (3–31)] (p = 0.0006). There were no significant differences between groups in the number of days to the improvement of feces (p = 0.38), or in days to normalization of fecal consistency (p = 0.43), respiratory rate (p = 0.42), heart rate (p = 0.27), body temperature (p = 0.12), peripheral white blood cell count (p = 0.37), improvement in appetite (p = 0.81), or attitude (p = 0.06). There was also no significant difference in survival to discharge (transfaunation 28/37, 75.7%; control 56/74, 75.7%, p = 1.0). Conclusion: There were no significant advantages of performing FMTs in horses with diarrhea in this retrospective study. This highlights the need for prospective, randomized studies to evaluate the efficacy of FMT, as well as different formulations, in horses with colitis before this can become standard practice.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85174235593&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ovj.2023.v13.i9.9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37842104; https://ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=151125; https://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ovj.2023.v13.i9.9; https://www.ejmanager.com/fulltextpdf.php?mno=151125
ScopeMed
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know