Analyzing Research Collaboration Trends in NCM Batteries Using Bibliometric Analysis
Journal of Scientometric Research, ISSN: 2320-0057, Vol: 13, Issue: 3s, Page: S39-S52
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Objectives: East Asian countries-notably South Korea, China and Japan-have achieved excellent research outcomes in this domain. This study examined the evolving research landscape of Nickel Cobalt Manganese (NCM) batteries, driven by their widespread application in diverse fields, particularly those of electric vehicles and energy storage. Research Design and Methods: Employing bibliometric techniques, we conducted a comprehensive analysis on NCM battery-related research papers retrieved from the Web of Science databases. Our investigation spanned publication trends, authorship patterns and citation networks, providing valuable insights into thematic content and collaborative dynamics. Findings: Our findings suggests that East Asia-particularly China-is likely to continue leading in NCM battery research. However, East Asian countries should focus on collaborations to further innovate. The findings offer a nuanced understanding of the current state of NCM battery research and elucidate the key patterns and collaborative networks. We systematically identified areas of emphasis and potential avenues for future research. Implications and Recommendations: This study could facilitate the establishment of effective collaborative strategies in the field of NCM batteries, which could have considerable implications for scientists, policymakers and industry professionals. As NCM batteries are used in a range of applications, a more granular analysis in future should focus on specific applications to yield more insightful results.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know