Covid-19 and the man-nature relationship: The balance violated. reflections on managing the complexity of pandemics: From ecosystem protection to the precautionary principle
Derecho Animal, ISSN: 2462-7518, Vol: 11, Issue: 4, Page: 129-140
2020
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The current pandemic crisis necessarily leads us to reflect on the interrelation of man and nature. The law today faces an epochal challenge: to face and manage a global complexity that affects fundamental interests and rights such as health and the environment, in a situation characterized by a high level of scientific uncertainty. This paper aims to offer a reflection on the need to look at the environment and its protection by opting for an ecosystemic approach capable of adequately capturing and considering the balance between the biotic and abiotic components and the role they can have for human life and well-being, including at the level of sustainable development. On this basis, we proceed to ask ourselves which is the correct operational dimension to attribute to the fundamental precautionary principle in this scenario, rediscovering its ecologically oriented origins and emphasizing the profile of man's responsibility towards the environment, from which the principle in question derives.
Bibliographic Details
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know